Mexican MAGAts Running for Harris County Office

August 24, 2026

If they will turn on their own, they will turn on you.

Mexican Americans are widely recognized for their competitive spirit and deep loyalty to family, community, and country. Historically, many Mexican American voters lean toward moderate political candidates rather than those on the extremes. Grounded in traditional values, strong faith traditions, and close ties to the Catholic Church, many prioritize family, anti-abortion stances, and lawful immigration processes.

However, a troubling shift continues in the Republican Party. A group of self-identified “Mexican MAGAt” candidates is running for office in Harris County under an increasingly extreme Republican platform. By aligning with a party whose policies actively harm immigrants, quiet endorsement of severe ICE enforcement practices in our streets, and rhetoric that targets Muslims, the LGBTQ+ community, educators, parents, and taxpayers, these candidates are actively opposing the interests of their own friends, families, and faith communities.

It’s sad that any human being would be supporting a party that is based on Khaos, Korruption, and Kruelty, the KKK of the Republican Party, much less an individual who knows their family and friends could be the next target of ICE. It is truly disgusting. There are more Mexican MAGAts running for State and Federal offices. That deserves a dedicated post.

The following six candidates in Harris County exemplify this shift:

  • Orlando Sanchez for Harris County Judge. He recently pleaded wth Mexican American voters to forget his is a Mexican MAGAt and a Republican. Orlando is actually Cuban American but you get the idea.
  • Richard Vega for County Commissioner Pct 2. Vega is a CHINO (Christian in Name Only) He is a pastor of some kind of christian spin off. He is a buddy of Donald Trump.
  • Israel Garcia for Judge County Civil Court at Law. Israel used to be a Democrat. He not only has turned his back on his party but also on his gente (people).
  • Xavier Alfaro for Judge County Criminal Court.
  • Jessica Padilla for Judge County Criminal Court. I don’t know what is worse, a Mexican American MAGAt or a female MAGAt.

Bay Area Democratic HQ Grand Opening Today!

August 23, 2026

La Marque’s Mayor Arrested.

August 22, 2026

This is sad on so many levels.

La Marque Mayor Keith Bell was arrested in Brazoria County on indecent exposure charges, though details remain sparse. This comes right as Council postponed an ethics ordinance set for a vote next month.

Mayor Bell has earned a reputation for running fair, structured meetings despite facing continuous pushback—most notably from Councilman Joseph Lowry, whose own tenure has been defined by past convictions, tax liens, lawsuits, and a history of personal attacks on city officials. While these charges against Mayor Bell are troubling, it is important to wait for the facts. If true, the Mayor should take full accountability and prioritize what is best for the community, rather than letting local governance descend further into political mudslinging.

Lowry, on the other hand, is a toxic, convicted felon buried in tax lawsuits and notorious for harassing anyone in La Marque who crosses him. (The Who’s Who of Who has been Harassed by La Marque City Councilman) He is universally disliked, even among his own MAGAt party’s base. He constantly attacks the Mayor and city officials with wild, proofless claims of fraud that the DA throws in the trash. He will inevitably celebrate this news, but there’s a world of difference between a decent leader who made a massive mistake and destructive politicians who take joy in creating chaos. If the charges against Bell are true, he needs to take responsibility and do what’s right for La Marque.

There are good people who make mistakes. Bell might be one of them. I hope that if the allegations are true Bell will do what is necessary to address his issues as well as do what is right for the city.

And there are sick, perverted, fucked up human beings like Trump and Lowry who enjoy making people miserable. It’s hard to feel sorry for them once they fall and eventually they will fall.

Good luck Mayor.


Guess Who is Funding Scott Bowen’s Campaign

August 21, 2026

There is more to this than just Bowen. That will deserve another post.

Scott Bowen, the former CCISD trustee, is now running for State Representative, presenting himself as the candidate who will represent the MAGA movement in the Bay Area. If elected, voters can expect him to support Governor Greg Abbott’s legislative agenda with little independence. That likely includes expanding Texas’ school voucher program and backing the governor’s priorities rather than advocating for the unique needs of our community. Greg Abbott will ride Scott like a birthday pony at a Catholic fall festival.

Bowen’s literature says he is campaigning on promises that include:

“Support Education – Keep our kids, staff, and teachers safe while on campus & focus curriculum on education, not politics.”

That claim deserves scrutiny as well as a loud “You’ve got to be fucking kidding me!”

During his time on the CCISD Board of Trustees, Bowen injected politics into local education rather than keeping it out. He sponsored a resolution on behalf of the Texas Republican Party endorsing Governor Abbott’s school voucher scheme. He recruited partisan, unqualified candidates to challenge incumbent trustees, with outside PAC money playing a significant role in those campaigns.

Harris County voters rejected Bowen by an eight-point margin in his last election. His record on the school board demonstrated his lack of political skills which resulted in his lack of accomplishments. Those same concerns now follow his campaign for the Texas House.

Bowen’s campaign is supported by outside of the district political money. His campaign materials identify Texans for Greg Abbott as the source of funding for his door hanger. The PAC has tens of millions of dollars available to support candidates who will advance the governor’s agenda. Critics argue that Bowen has consistently relied on outside PAC support rather than building broad financial backing from within the district. (All documented at bayareahouston.net/ScottBowen)

The question for Bay Area voters is straightforward: Do you want a representative who will primarily advance the priorities of Austin’s political leadership, or someone who will put the interests of this community first? It is clear Scott Bowen will take a knee to Greg Abbott.

Folks, it is time to pony up.

BTW The MAGA hats were added for clarity.


Orlando Sanchez: I’m a Mexican MAGAt

August 20, 2026

First he flocked up a question about Flock cameras.

Once again, Harris County Judge candidate Orlando Sanchez has misread the room—this time on immigration and ICE.

Just last week, he missed a clear opportunity to side with the vast majority of Houstonians against Flock cameras. Instead of supporting immediate limits on county Flock Safety camera usage following reports of database misuse by law enforcement, Sanchez called those concerns premature. It sent completely the wrong message.

Now, he’s double-downed in front of a predominantly Hispanic crowd. Addressing a recent fatal shooting by federal agents, Sanchez effectively advocated for letting ICE police itself rather than pushing for a vigorous county investigation. Beyond deflecting county oversight, he had the audacity to tell attendees to simply forget his party affiliation. As reported by the Houston Press, Sanchez stated:

“I ask you to ignore that R and remember who Orlando Sanchez is. I know they are going to call me MAGA Sanchez. My response is: I’m Orlando Sanchez. I’ve never hitched my wagon to any extreme ideals. I am my own man. I am not going to listen to some slogan from some past presidential election.”

While I agree that Sanchez hasn’t publicly embraced extreme MAGA positions, the party he runs under and receives funding from is fundamentally defined by them. In today’s political landscape, you cannot simply distance yourself when convenient; you either enable the party’s direction or you stand against it. Demanding the privileges of party backing while ignoring its real-world consequences is like driving the get-away car in a drive-by shooting and claiming innocence in the loss of a 7 year old’s life.

For the past decade, Sanchez has mirrored former Judge Ed Emmett’s quiet strategy regarding national party actions. He remained silent while his party abandoned its moral baseline, racked up national debt, and turned a blind eye to ICE abuses affecting immigrants and American citizens alike. As I said in 2018 Dear Ed Emmett:

I commend you for the job you did, but I am a Mexican American. I look like the people your party has demonized. I was thanking you for your job well done while your party directed hate at other humans who, by the way, looked like me. Was I suppose to validate your silence by giving you another 4 years of tolerating the racists in your party?

Now, like Emmett, he wants Hispanics to forget he was driving the fucking car while ICE kills human beings on the streets of Harris County. Orlando Sanchez is a Mexican MAGAt. He deserves nothing from us. Go fuck yourself Orlando.


BREAKING: Local Political Blogger Defends La Marque Councilman Joseph Lowry

August 19, 2026

It’s a first.

I have spent a significant amount of time focusing on La Marque Councilman Joseph Lowry, and with good reason. After some reflection, I have to admit that I actually agree with Lowry on one point: the city’s upcoming Ethics Ordinance is specifically targeting him.

And frankly, it should.

The City of La Marque was forced to revise its code due to an escalation in harassment targeting city employees, elected officials, and residents. Most municipalities maintain standard ethics policies to enforce baseline, common-sense professional behavior among staff, appointees, and council members. These rules outline unacceptable conduct and establish a clear remedies process. It is unfortunate that a city must explicitly put rules against harassment, conflicts of interest, and accepting improper gifts into writing—these concepts should simply be standard practice.

However, as Lowry noted, this ordinance directly addresses his specific behavior. He stands alone on the council when it comes to this pattern of conduct which can be viewed at “The Who’s Who of Who has been Harassed by La Marque City Councilman” including:

  • He is the only council member with a documented history of harassing colleagues (though his harassment of Councilwoman Yancy halted following a legal settlement).
  • He is the sole member accused of sexually harassing staff, notably by handing out a “Recall these balls” cookie.
  • He repeatedly levels unproven allegations against the Mayor regarding corruption and bribery.
  • He is the only member to have Temporary Restraining Orders filed against him by local citizens.
  • His track record includes harassing families in public restaurants, a First Amendment Auditor, and even a newborn baby.

Even advocacy groups like Stop Harassment In Texas (SHIT) have weighed in, stating plainly that no public employee or resident should have to endure this type of behavior or take this shit.

So, yes—I agree with Lowry. This ethics policy directly responds to his past conduct because he is the sole source of these issues. In practice, however, the ordinance applies equally to every city official and employee, not just him.

The council convenes today at 4:00 PM to consider adopting this measure and to address the lawsuit Lowry brought against the city—a case he has already lost in both District and Appeals Court.


MAGAt Restaurant Replacing The Hop in Clear Lake

August 19, 2026

Oh this could be sad.

According to the Houston Chronicle:

  • Piper Hospitality Group confirmed to Chron first that Preslee’s Southern Good Eatery will open a location there after the Hop officially closes on Tuesday, Aug. 4, operations manager Ryan Manos told Chron. They hope to open the restaurant sometime this fall.

They have a restaurant north of Houston and considering their signage I probably won’t step foot in it. You can see for yourself below. Preslee’s is a “family friendly” restaurant. Hopefully they will drop their fucked up political views and stick to being friendly to families. All families.


The Billionaires Who Donated to Greg Abbott in the First Half of 2026

August 18, 2026

If you think Greg Abbott is on your side you might want to switch sides.

In an earlier post, Greg Abbott’s Billionaire Buddies Donations (It’s Not Pretty), I detailed how Greg Abbott accumulated over $336 million in donations across his political career. In just the first six months of 2026, he has once again pulled in a staggering amount of campaign cash—driven almost entirely by billionaires.

According to filings with the Texas Ethics Commission, Abbott raised more than $28 million between January and July of 2026. Of that total:

  • $1,000 or less: Small-dollar contributions accounted for only $1.8 million (about 6.4% of his total).
  • $100 or less: Everyday working- and middle-class donors giving up to $100 made up just $1.2 million—roughly 4% of the overall haul.
  • $100,000 or more: Major donors contributed $20,295,000, representing 72% of his total funds.
  • $250,000 or more: A mere 35 individual donors accounted for over $15 million, making up more than 53% of his total fundraising.

The bulk of Abbott’s funding continues to come from a tiny handful of ultra-wealthy contributors rather than grassroots supporters. You can review the full spreadsheet of 2026 donations here. The 35 mega-donors who gave over $250,000 are listed below.

DonorAmountOccupation
Roski ,Edward$1,000,000Majestic Realty Co.
Doggett ,William$1,000,000Doggett Equipment Services Group
Texas Republican Leadership Fund$1,000,000
Andresen ,Matthew$500,000Headlands Technologies LLC
Bennett ,John$500,000Black Mountain
Cox ,Bobby$500,000Bobby Cox Companies Inc.
Gebbia ,Joe$500,000Self
Jones ,Jerral$500,000Dallas Cowboys
Musk ,Elon$500,000Space X & Tesla Motors
Nau ,John$500,000Silver Eagle Distributors, LP
Price ,Mackenzie$500,000Alpha School
Stedman ,Stuart$500,000Stedman West Interests Inc
Warren ,Kelcy$500,000Energy Transfer
Acosta ,Arcilia$400,000Carcon Industries
Anwar ,S. Javaid$250,000Midland Energy Inc.
Anwar ,S. Javaid$250,000Midland Energy Inc.
Anwar ,S. Javaid$250,000Midland Energy Inc.
Anwar ,S. Javaid$250,000Midland Energy Inc.
Anwar ,S. Javaid$250,000Midland Energy Inc.
Anwar ,S. Javaid$250,000Midland Energy Inc.
Aplin ,Arch$250,000Buc-ee’s Ltd.
Baggett ,David$250,000Opportune LLP
Bellinger ,John$250,000Food Safety Net Services
Bodenstedt ,James$250,000MUY Brands, LLC
Campbell ,Cody$250,000Double Eagle Development LLC
Crow ,Harlan$250,000Crow Family Holdings
Duncan ,Janet$250,000Retired
Fertitta ,Paige$250,000Fertitta Entertainment
Foster ,Paul$250,000Franklin Mountain Management
Graham ,Jay$250,000Spur Energy Partners
Gulf States Toyota Inc. State PAC$250,000
Jain ,Anurag$250,000Perot Jain LP
Mayfair Investments$250,000
Peinado ,Frank$250,000FA Peinado, LLC
Perot ,H. Ross$250,000Hillwood Development Corp.
Perot ,H. Ross$250,000Hillwood Development Corp.
Sellers ,John$250,000Double Eagle Development
SRR Ranches LLC$250,000
Swinbank ,Joseph$250,000Sprint Waste Services, L.P.
Texas Sands PAC$250,000
Weisman ,John$250,000Hunter Industries
$15,150,000

La Marque City Councilman Files $1 Million Lawsuit

August 17, 2026

It’s Lowry. Again.

La Marque City Councilman Joseph Lowry is no stranger to courtroom battles, often finding himself on either side of a lawsuit. His latest legal maneuver stems from a recent truck accident in which he claims he was “T-boned” in his truck. Given Lowry’s habit of broadcasting Facebook Live videos while behind the wheel, questions remain as to whether a forensic audit of his phone might play a role in the investigation. Nevertheless, he has officially filed a petition, CV-0095926, seeking $1 million in damages against the driver.

You can read the original petition here. His suit is demanding $1 Million for the following:

  • Compensatory damages against Defendant;
  • Actual damages
  • Past and future medical expenses;
  • Past and future lost wages;
  • Past and future loss of household services;
  • Consequential damages;
  • Pain and suffering;
  • Exemplary damages;
  • Past and future mental anguish;
  • Past and future impairment;
  • Past and future disfigurement;
  • Interest on damages (pre and post-judgment) in accordance with the law
  • Costs of Court;
  • Expert witness fees;
  • Costs of copies of depositions; and
  • Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

Greg Abbott’s Billionaire Buddies Donations (It’s Not Pretty)

August 17, 2026

And you wonder who ruined your State?

Greg Abbott’s entire career has been built in public service, sucking on the tit of the government—first as a Supreme Court Justice, then as Attorney General, and now as Governor. Over the course of his gubernatorial runs, he has raised a staggering $336 million.

A significant chunk of that money—$53 million—comes from just 10 billionaire donors who wrote single checks of $1 million or more. That includes $8.5 million originating from out-of-state donors in California and Nevada. Topping the donor list is Javaid Anwar of Midland Energy, whose contributions to only Abbott exceed $15 million. He deserves a dedicated post on his entire contributions.

Notably, these numbers leave out powerful groups whose donations only cross the million-dollar mark when added together. For instance, Texans for Lawsuit Reform gave Abbott $1.5 million over this period, but kept each individual check below $1 million. See The Trillionaire, Billionaires, and Millionaires Running the Texas GOP

Uncovering this data isn’t easy. The Texas Ethics Commission report for “Texans for Greg Abbott” contains over 73,000 pages and more than 1 million raw entries. Because the dataset is too massive to download in full, public access is limited to basic fields: contribution counts, report numbers, and dollar amounts.

Fueled by millionaires and billionaires, Abbott’s campaign machine relies on major wealthy donors to stay in power. Here are the 10 billionaire mega-donors who gave at least one $1 million donation:

NameDonationCityStateCompany
Anwar, Javaid$15,565,278Midland TexasMidland Energy Inc.
Roski, Edwar$5,850,000City of IndustryCaliforniaMajestic Realty Co
Warren ,Kelcy$5,250,000DallasTexasEnergy Transfer
Pitcock ,James$4,606,069Houston TexasTexasWilliams Brothers 
Troutt ,Kenny$4,150,000DallasTexasExcel Communications
Porter, Michael$3,850,000DossTexasRancher
Doggett ,William$3,400,054HoustonTexasDoggestt Equipment
fisher, Kenneth$3,325,430PlanoTexasFisher Investments
Gebbia ,Joe$2,502,500West Lake HillTexasAirbnb
Adelson, Miriam$2,500,000Las VegasNevadaDoctor
Texas Republican Leadership$2,000,000AmarilloTexasPAC
$52,999,331

Abbott to Green Light Data Centers Once Reelected

August 16, 2026

Over his twelve-year tenure as Governor, Greg Abbott has consistently prioritized corporate recruitment, encouraging businesses to relocate to Texas. While these economic policies attracted major corporations, critics argue they have contributed to increased housing costs, traffic congestion, and a higher cost of living. Furthermore, the expansion of over 300 data centers—supported by massive tax incentives—has raised significant concerns regarding water usage and power grid stability.

As public concern over the environmental and infrastructural impacts of data centers grows, Governor Abbott has recently called for a moratorium and temporary guardrails on new construction. However, skepticism remains as to whether these measures reflect a genuine shift in policy or a temporary political response. Voters seeking long-term infrastructure stability and resource protection may question whether current leadership will maintain strict oversight following the election.

Abbott encouraged corporations to build data centers in Texas. He is responsible for their encroachment on our communities and now he is claiming he will put up guardrails for our protection. Abbott is 12 years too late. He had the opportunity to take action before he approved the data centers. He caused the problem he is trying to now fixed.

Just like the cost of auto, home, and health insurance, and education, and the electric grid, and property taxes. Don’t be an idiot. Abbott is the problem. He doesn’t have a leg to stand on. It’s time to roll him out of office.


Orlando Sanchez Flubs the Flocking Question

August 15, 2026

Read the room dude.

During the debate on Flock camera usage, Harris County Judge candidates Letitia Plummer and Orlando Sanchez took center stage—and Sanchez completely flocked it up. (Hope you’re enjoying the flocking puns as much as I am!) According to the Houston Chronicle Orlando said:

Sanchez cast Plummer’s Flock proposal as another example of the Democratic nominee making hasty conclusions before gathering the facts. He said in a Friday statement he would engage with public safety officials and community members on the issue before making any promises he may later have to walk back.

Here is what Plummer said which seems like common sense ideas that should have been put in place when the Flockers were put in place.

Plummer said, if elected, she would mandate the county publish a clear policy on when officers can use the technology, publish annual audits, introduce strict data retention limits and prohibit data sharing with any agencies outside of Harris County unless it’s in support of a specific criminal investigation.

Had Orlando played this strategically, he would have aligned with Plummer while insisting, “We must establish strict policies to ensure these cameras are never used for citizen surveillance or tracking.” Instead, he dismissed guardrails as premature. Meanwhile, it is increasingly evident that these systems are being used for unconstitutional tracking. Cities across the country are cutting ties with Flock, and communities like League City are putting the issue directly to voters. The time to demand sweeping reform is now but Sanchez Flocked up this easy question.

If you want to see if there are Flockers in your area see defrock.org and find out if you have been Flocked by visiting https://haveibeenflocked.com


What is “Medicare for All”? It’s MIFA. (Medical Insurance for All)

August 14, 2026

The U.S. healthcare system undoubtedly needs reform, but Medicare for All (M4A) is likely the wrong solution—and under its current champions, it’s politically dead on arrival.

Next time a politician campaigns on Medicare for All, ask them to explain it. Most will struggle. With Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Pramila Jayapal sponsoring the legislation, it stands virtually zero chance of becoming law. Neither lawmaker has a track record of passing major legislation, let alone completely rewriting American health policy. They excel at mobilizing movement rhetoric, but leave the painstaking work of negotiation and politicking to others. If advocates actually want M4A to pass, they need more pragmatic sponsors.

To evaluate the policy objectively, we must first dispel three major misconceptions:

  • Medicare for All is NOT traditional Medicare: Standard Medicare only covers 80% of costs, leaving patients responsible for the remaining 20% unless they buy supplemental private insurance. It also excludes dental, vision, hearing long-term care, and prescription drugs (unless purchased separately). Traditional Medicare would bankrupt most families during a health crisis—a stark contrast to M4A’s comprehensive scope.
  • Medicare for All is NOT healthcare: It is a government-run health insurance system designed to eliminate private insurers for core services. Private plans would be banned from offering any coverage that overlaps with M4A. To be accurate, Sanders and his allies should rename it what it actually is: Medical Insurance for All (MIFA).
  • Medical Insurance for All is NOT free: While traditional Medicare is funded through a 2.9% payroll tax split between employees and employers, MIFA would require vastly higher funding. Draft proposals rely on heavy payroll taxes—ranging from 4% on workers and 7.5% on employers up to 30% overall depending on income tiers.

Ultimately, MIFA is an all-inclusive coverage model that expands far beyond traditional Medicare to cover vision, dental, and long-term care. Here are the main highlights of how MIFA would function:

  • Will cover all Americans.
  • Will cover all medical expenses for core services
  • Will replace private insurance with few exceptions
  • Includes dental, vision, and hearing
  • Includes long term care
  • Will be paid for by payroll taxes
  • Will require service providers to adhere to lower standard for payment

MIFA will be a very difficult sell and almost impossible to pass much like The Affordable Care Act which required significant influence and politicking. Currently those campaigning on “Medicare for All” are being dishonest on the issue. They should come clean and call it what it is and get better sponsors of the bill.


League City Mayor Long Flip Flops on Flocks

August 12, 2026

It must be election season.

League City Council has voted to put a non binding resolution on the continued use of Flock cameras on the ballot for the upcoming election in November. According to Google:

A Flock camera is an automated license plate reader (ALPR) system made by Flock Safety. These solar or battery-powered cameras capture the license plates, vehicle makes, models, colors, and unique features of passing cars, logging the data into a searchable network used by police, HOAs, and businesses.

Public concern is growing over the purchase and deployment of Flock license plate cameras, with residents questioning both the necessity of HOA involvement and the initial authorization process. Under Mayor Nick Long’s leadership, the City Council approved spending $899,600 on a 5 year contract to lease 70 cameras from the Flock Group in December 2023. (resolution #23-0604) A related resolution (#23-0611) allocated $200,000 to place these cameras directly in local neighborhoods. Councilmen Crews and Tressler were the sole dissenting votes. Critics continue to question why private homeowners associations require access to this level of surveillance technology.

The Flock system has faced nationwide scrutiny over privacy risks and potential abuse. In one notable incident, a Pasadena police sergeant resigned and surrendered his law enforcement license following an internal investigation that found he used the technology to stalk a female colleague.

Now, Mayor Long is asking residents to weigh in on whether to dismantle the program he originally spearheaded—raising further questions about the administration’s overall strategy.

Makes you want to ask What the Flock is going on!


The Joseph Lowry Ethics Reform Ordinance Passes in La Marque

August 11, 2026

It’s not what you think it is. You can read the entire new ordinance here.

Last night, the City Council conducted the first reading of a proposed rewrite of their Code of Ethics. If passed, the ordinance will apply to current city employees, Council members, and former city officials. According to the ordinance:

Rather, this Article is intended to provide a framework within which to encourage ethical behavior and enforce basic standards of conduct while providing due process that protects the rights of both the Complainant and the Accused. 

If you actually read the proposed ordinance, you’ll see it’s completely standard for cities of any size. Contrary to Councilman Joseph Lowry’s claims, it does not give City Council the power to remove an elected official. Higher governing bodies certainly have that power—Congress expelled George Santos, and the Texas House expelled Bryan Slaton after a severe conduct investigation of providing alcohol to an underaged staffer and having all night sex with her. Houston’s City Council can’t remove a colleague; at most, they can strip committee assignments or restrict participation, as seen previously with Councilman Greg Travis.

What the ordinance does do is set baseline ethics standards—prohibiting harassment, conflicts of interest, illegal gifts, and the misuse of city resources. All are common sense ethical standards. It also creates a structured review process for official complaints, but the available penalties stop short of removal. While Lowry might try to use this new system to level allegations against Mayor Bell and Councilmember Yancy, the process requires verifiable evidence—something Lowry has claimed to hold for five years, though he has yet to produce it. It also addresses frivolous complaints and penalties for filing them.

You can read the entire new ordinance here.


The Elephant in the Room: Texas GOP Convention Controversy

August 11, 2026

Remember when an elephant urinated across the George R. Brown Convention Center floor during the Texas Republican Convention, as detailed in the Houston Chronicle report, “Texas GOP’s surprise elephant takes giant pee at convention”?

There is more to the story. Following that report, I reached out to our City Council member to inquire whether the Texas GOP and the elephant handler, Trunks & Humps, had submitted all required permits and paperwork to the Houston First Corporation—the entity that manages exhibits at the GRB. Their website’s “About” section states:

A local government corporation formed in 2011, Houston First’s responsibilities include the development of the destination brand strategy, promoting the city worldwide, driving tourism and convention business, operating numerous facilities, producing events that serve the community, collaborating with commercial and industry partners and much more.

City Councilwoman Sallie Alcorn’s staff received the following response from Houston First:

Please be advised that every facility license agreement issued by HFC requires that the event client “strictly comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations”. Relatedly, we further include a statement that the event client “shall acquire any federal, state and/or municipal permits or licenses required for the event”.

An open records request was submitted to review the facility license agreement, emails, and related correspondence. Unbelievably, the records yielded no agreements, applications, or receipts for the $25,000 Governor Greg Abbott paid to Trunks & Humps. The file contained only a couple of brief emails between Abbott’s staffer, Grayson Freeman, and Brenda Wharry of Houston First Corporation. It seems impossible that this represents the full record required to bring a large, possibly dangerous, animal into a crowded facility.

Either someone provided inaccurate information to our Council member, or the response to the open records request was incomplete. Or maybe Houston First was doing a favor for Abbott which I would not doubt one bit. For those who haven’t seen the footage of the elephant at the convention, the video is linked below, along with the official open records response (which incurred a $1.50 fee).

More updates on this story will follow.


Raising Campaign Cash: Scott Bowen. All PAC no Cattle

August 10, 2026

All PAC, No Cattle (Thanks D for the title idea!)

Former CCISD Trustee Scott Bowen is following in the footsteps of current State Representative Dennis Paul by heavily relying on out-of-district PAC money to finance his campaign.

As noted in a previous post, Bowen raised an impressive $89,000—far exceeding any single-period total from his predecessor. However, $65,000 of that came from just three Political Action Committees: Texans for Lawsuit Reform ($40,000), Texans for a Conservative Majority ($15,000), and—surprisingly—the Texas Trial Lawyers PAC ($10,000). That coalition raises obvious questions.

Looking at his broader fundraising numbers reveals an even clearer pattern: Bowen’s war chest is packed almost entirely with outside capital. Out of $190,884 raised in his latest report:

  • Out-of-District PACs: $150,549 (79% of total funds)
  • Individual Donors: $40,335 (21% of total funds)
  • In-District Support: Only 19% of total funds, coming from just 25 donors.

Struggling to secure financial support from the very community you seek to represent speaks volumes.

By contrast, his opponent, Albert Wittliff, raised 68% of his funds directly from within the district, with PAC contributions totaling just $452 (less than 1%). Wittliff remains an exceptional candidate for State Representative—commanding, articulate, highly experienced, and battle-tested through his service protecting diplomats in hostile environments.

Bowen, on the other hand, comes across as awkward, carries a record of failed policy initiatives as a CCISD Trustee, and lacks the fundamental political skills required for state representation. He is effectively the district’s new “PAC-MAN,” destined to fall in line with leadership rather than advocate for local constituents.

Wa-ka-wa-ka.

Wittliff, AlbertAmount% of Total# of ContributionsUnique Donors
Total Contributions $54,188.30 294155
Total in Texas $46,289.40 85%272
Total In District $36,665.52 68%199
Total PAC $452.39 0.80%2
Total Individual $53,735.91 99.20%292
Most common occupationsNot Employed/Retired62
Engineer23
Business14
Teacher11
Technology7
Healthcare6
Accountant5
Data Analyst4
Attorney4
Scientist4
Average Monetary Contribution $                          120.57 
Bowen, ScottAmount% of Total# of ContributionsUnique Donors
Total Contributions $ 190,884.83 10391
Total in Texas $ 190,634.83 99.90%102
Total In District $   36,665.52 19%25
Total PAC $ 150,549.69 78.90%26
Total Individual $   40,335.14 21.10%77
Most common occupationsRetired22
Business16
Attorney11
Engineer7
State Rep4
Healthcare3
Realtor3
Banker1
Media1
Lobbyist1
Average Monetary Contribution $     1,180.57 

But Sir, What is Medicare for All?

August 6, 2026

Nobody knows.

With more candidates campaigning on Medicare For All it might be a good time to ask them what that means. Asking candidates about the mechanics of “Medicare for All” usually stops them in their tracks—because few can actually explain how it would work. M4A sounds simple on the surface, but it represents a radical overhaul of health insurance—not healthcare itself. Medicare doesn’t employ doctors or run hospitals; it’s just government-funded coverage. That distinction is just the beginning of the problem. Senator Bernie Sanders has championed this issue for over four decades with virtually no tangible progress.

Over the years, the branding has constantly shifted—from “Universal Healthcare” to “Single Payer,” and now “Medicare for All.” When the legislation was last estimated, the price tag came in at a staggering $30 trillion. That number alone should give any taxpayer serious pause.

Furthermore, Medicare is far from free. Today’s retirees pay into the fund throughout their working lives and continues to pay at age 65 based on their income and selective coverage. Standard Medicare only covers 80% of costs, leaving gaps for hospital stays (Part A), doctor visits (Part B), and prescriptions (Part D)—all with separate price tags—while completely ignoring dental and vision. Which of these parts would “Medicare for All” actually include?

Beyond the coverage gaps, the economic fallout would be massive:

  • Job Loss: Over one million Americans work in the health insurance industry. Telling them to simply “find another job” is wildly unrealistic.
  • Provider Shortages: Many doctors already limit or decline Medicare patients due to low reimbursement rates. Forcing lower payment schedules across the board could bankrupt providers or drive them out of practice.
  • Lack of a Champion and plan. Passing significant legislation like transforming our healthcare system requires a champion with a history of success. It requires successful politicians who have the power to convince others to join his cause. Bernie Sanders is not that champion. His only successful legislation is renaming a couple of post offices. After 40 years he has only been able to talk about it and nothing else.

Ultimately, the unanswered questions remain: How will it be funded, and what will it truly cost? The next time a politician promises “Medicare for All,” demand specifics—and ask how they expect to pass a 30 trillion-dollar pipe dream through Congress.

And ask Bernie Sanders why he hasn’t made any progress on his pie in the sky idea over the last 40+ years.


What the Flock? Flock Cameras Saturating the Bay Area.

August 5, 2026

This gives new meaning to WTF?

Thanks to my friend Allison for pointing this out. Flock cameras are motion-activated automatic license plate readers (ALPR) made by Flock Safety. They are intended to be used to locate individuals, who have broken the law, by reading their license plate and reporting to law enforcement. Law enforcement can then execute warrants on their arrest. Flock cameras has been successful in this endeavor unfortunately law enforcement has already been abusing the cameras by tracking innocent civilians.

The Bay Area is flooded with Flock cameras You can look at the locations of all the Flock cameras by visiting deflock.org. This is the locations of 22 Flock cameras in just one block of Nassau Bay:

Flock cameras are not intended to be used to track civilians which would be a violation of the Constitution but many law enforcement agencies have been caught use the technology to track individuals illegally. In Galveston there are questions whether the abuse resulted in the arrest of a “1st Amendment Auditor” in Galveston. It seems like law enforcement was looking for this individual and waiting for an alert showing he had entered Galveston County. The Sheriff’s office then had a judge sign off on a warrant for his arrest. A lawsuit against Galveston County may be in order.

Many are taking action against the cameras by cutting them down, which is against the law and is not encouraged. The cameras will continue to be a controversial issue until there are safeguards put in place.

Until then enjoy the Flock out of them.


The Trillionaire, Billionaires, and Millionaires Running the Texas GOP

August 4, 2026

In Texas, there are zero limits on what individuals or PACs can donate to political campaigns—and everyday voters are paying the price. Money in politics has spiraled out of control. Conservative commentators love using George Soros as a scapegoat, accusing him of paying for every protest and filling every auditorium. But while they fixate on him, they conveniently ignore the network of billionaires and megadonors actually bankrolling the Texas GOP.

Here are a few of the key players pulling the strings:

  • Trillionaire Elon Musk. As reported yesterday Musk has donated almost $10 Million in the past two years. He will be funding candidates all across the state especially in Harris County. Maybe that is why the candidates running for office in Harris County have not raised much money.
  • Billionaire Texas Comptroller Don Huffines. Huffines has just been appointed by Governor Abbott to be the Texas Comptroller. Huffines has used his wealth to win his Senate seat and will continue in his race for Comptroller. So far has used $20 Million of his own money for his race.
  • Billionaire Timothy Dunn. Has donated $850,000 to various white wing organizations in just 2016 alone. Since 2012 he has donated over $21 Million.
  • Billionaire Farris Wilks donated over $1.5 Million in 2025. He has donated over $14 Million since 2008.
  • Millionaire State Senator Money Mayes Middleton. Middleton is spending over $20 Million of his own money to become the Attorney General of Texas. He has spent millions of his own money in his race for the Texas House and Texas Senate.
  • Millionaires David and Richard Weekley. Both have donated over $34 Million to various individuals and PACs especially to Texans for Lawsuit Reform, an organization that protects companies from being held accountable in court.
  • Millionaire Alex Fairly. Alex is a new comer to GOP politics donating over $21 Million since 2019, that is in a 7 year span. This includes a one time donation of $20 Million to the Texas Republican Leadership Fund.

So, what’s in your wallet? LOL. Probably nothing.


Bay Area Houston

Hard hitting political commentary always full of wit in Houston Texas.

Skip to content ↓