While in Minnesota she criticized President Obama for signing a historic nuclear arms treaty, one that the conservative in chief, Ronald Reagan, supported in the 80s. From Alan Combes blog:
“No administration in America’s history would, I think, ever have considered such a step that we just found out President Obama is supporting today. It’s unbelievable. It’s like getting out there on a playground, a bunch of kids, getting ready to fight, and one of them says, ‘Go ahead, punch me in the face. I’m not going to retaliate. Do what you want to with me.’No administration except for the Reagan administration.
The first strategic arms reduction proposal (START) was presented by United States President Ronald Reagan in Geneva on 29 June 1982. Reagan proposed a dramatic reduction in strategic forces in two phases, which he referred to as SALT III at the time.[3] The first phase would reduce overall warhead counts on any missile type to 5,000, with an additional limit of 2,500 on ICBMs. Additionally, a total of 850 ICBMs would be allowed, with a limit of 110 “heavy throw” missiles like the SS-18, with additional limits on the total “throw weight” of the missiles as well. The second phase introduced similar limits on heavy bombers and their warheads, and other strategic systems as well.
Go figure.
3 comments:
Palin wasn't talking about the New START treaty; she was talking about the Nuclear Posture Review.
You're conflating the New START treaty with the Nuclear Posture Review. Palin was criticizing the latter, not the former.
The way the news came out is worrying. last child a rumor on the Internet about the Palin family is a child of Bristol has helped to deprive the news of her pregnancy from the darkroom into the secrets of the family to honor the national news. It was after that rumor is in line to the family told us about the pregnancy before marriage. Sarah Palin should have volunteered this information once it has hit the campaign with Senator John McCain.
Generic Viagra India
Post a Comment